Score breakdown
🧬 Most similar developers
Closest profile, nearby score
🔥 Full roast
🔥 With 11 years on GitHub, only 26 followers, 12 personal repos with a total of 18 stars and a top star of 7 for a 2015 toy CNN, yet he has 34 PRs to apache/answer (15.5k stars) and 18 PRs to OpenTeleme
hgaol — 77.50/100 · SOLID (Solid · Trustworthy)
TL;DR: 11-year GitHub veteran with a solid track record of contributions to Apache and OpenTelemetry flagship projects, but a barren personal repo portfolio, lopsided 3:1 follow-to-follower ratio, and a fork-heavy profile that says you collect code more than you create it.
| Dimension | Score | Notes |
|---|---|---|
| Account maturity | 10/10 | Registered 11.21 years, active across 12 contribution years, last activity 0 days ago — this account has more tenure than most of the frameworks you’ve PR’d into. |
| Original project quality | 6.2/18 | 18 total stars across 12 original repos, top repo is a 7-star C++ mini CNN toy from 2015, best repo is a 2-star Berkeley DB homework project — your personal portfolio is a learning exercise graveyard, not a product showcase. |
| Contribution quality | 24.8/27 | 119 merged PRs out of 133 total, only 2 maintainer-closed unmerged, 9 trivial PRs in the recent 50-sample, recent external doc-like PR ratio 0.14 — no PR farming, no templated spam, just consistent low-drama contributions to other people’s codebases. |
| Ecosystem / maintenance impact | 18.5/20 | 80 PRs and 140 commits spread across 7 high-star popular repos (apache/answer, apache/shenyu, opentelemetry-collector-contrib), no single repo dominates more than 42.5% of your impact — you’re a reliable utility player for the Apache and OpenTelemetry ecosystems, not a one-repo wonder. |
| Community influence | 3.2/8 | 26 followers, 81 following — your 3:1 follow-to-follower ratio means you’re here to support projects, not build an audience. |
| Activity authenticity | 14.8/17 | 243 contributions last year, active across 12 years, templated PR ratio 0.13, no PR flood or bot signals — your activity is genuine, just entirely focused on other people’s codebases. |
Red flags
- 23 all-time contributions to high-star popular repos lack file-level quality samples, but this is a prompt coverage limitation, not a signal of low-quality work.
- Recent PR sample has moderate concentration on apache/answer, but all-time impact is distributed across 7 distinct popular repos with no single repo accounting for more than 42.5% of total impact PRs, so no significant concentration risk.
Score calibration No extra adjustment. The base score accurately captures your solid all-time contribution record, with no unusual signals requiring a bump or haircut.
Verdict Normal, solid open source contributor with consistent, meaningful contributions to flagship projects — your personal repo wasteland and lopsided follow ratio are the only things keeping you out of a higher tier.