🏆 Notable contributions
Popular open-source repos they've shipped to (commits + PRs)
Score breakdown
🛠 Featured work
Their own popular and pinned repositories
🌐 SSH-based credential forwarding for LLM tools — your API keys never leave your local machine! 🔒
RustA tool for SynthV to generate lip animation./SynthV口型动画生成工具
C#A tool to check your deadline in Gradescope / Hydro / Blackboard
PythonPPTX Agent workflow skills
Shell🧬 Stack & domains
🧬 Most similar developers
Closest profile, nearby score
🔥 Full roast
🔥 155 merged PRs, 43% dumped into a 6-star school repo, and your only 2 high-star contributions are unverified — your open-source impact is a ghost story, while your personal projects have 58 stars tota
HeZeBang — 75.00/100 · SOLID (Solid · Trustworthy)
TL;DR: Nine years of real code (keybearer, 1,384 contributions last year) and a clean merge record, but your ecosystem impact is unverified, your 44 personal repos have 58 stars combined, and 43% of recent PRs target one 6-star school repo.
| Dimension | Score | Notes |
|---|---|---|
| Account maturity | 10/10 | 9.22 years old, 10 active contribution years, 1,384 contributions last year — this isn't a fresh account, but longevity alone doesn't buy you stars. |
| Original project quality | 10/18 | 44 original repos, 58 total stars, max 14 stars on keybearer (Rust SSH credential tool, quality score 0.9) — decent engineering, but your home turf is starved. |
| Contribution quality | 24.7/27 | 155 merged PRs out of 172 total, zero maintainer rejections; 6 author-closed external PRs and 6 on own repos. Clean merge rate, but 43% of recent PRs target one 6-star school repo. |
| Ecosystem / maintenance impact | 9/20 | 2 PRs + 0 commits into ★10,278 repos (caelestia-dots/shell); file-level verification sample is empty, so this score is riding on trust. |
| Community influence | 4.7/8 | 58 followers with 43 following — a healthy ratio, but the follower count mirrors your total star count: modest. |
| Activity authenticity | 16.6/17 | Last year: 1,384 contributions across 4 activity types, active for 10 years, last activity 1 day ago. Authentic and sustained. |
Red flags
- The two all-time popular-repo contributions (to caelestia-dots/shell, 10,278 stars) lack file-level verification; if they turn out to be low-quality or documentation-only, the ecosystem impact sub-score would be inflated.
- 43% of recent PRs target a single school organization repo (ShanghaitechGeekPie/coursebench-frontend, 6 stars), which overstates the breadth of external ecosystem impact.
Score calibration No extra adjustment. The two contributions to the 10,278-star repo lack file-level verification, and the base score already reflects that uncertainty.
Verdict Normal, with asterisks. The account is a legitimate, active contributor with genuine code and sustained activity, but the unverified popular-repo contributions and heavy concentration on a single school repo keep it from climbing higher.