Score breakdown
🧬 Most similar developers
Closest profile, nearby score
🔥 Full roast
🔥 77% of your recent PRs target the 0-star moeru-ai/eventa.net that doesn't even appear on your impact list, your top-starred original repo is your own 4-star profile, total original stars are just 11,
Garfield550 — 64.10/100 · NPC (Average · Unremarkable)
TL;DR: A 13-year-old account with 1,629 contributions last year that collapses under scrutiny: home turf is a starless ghost town, most recent work orbits a 0-star repo that doesn't even count as impact, and ecosystem impact was capped for being docs/i18n/UI fluff rather than core engineering.
| Dimension | Score | Notes |
|---|---|---|
| Account maturity | 10/10 | Registered 13.4 years, active across 14 contribution years, last activity 15 days ago — the only dimension that doesn't make you cringe. |
| Original project quality | 4.7/18 | 11 original repos rack up a combined 11 stars, with your top-starred repo being your own 4-star profile page (description: "Me!") — your home turf is a ghost town with a vanity sign. |
| Contribution quality | 28.7/27 | 370 merged PRs out of 390 total, but 12 of those external PRs were closed by you yourself, and 38% of your recent merged PRs are docs/i18n/UI touch-ups — quantity doesn't make up for the water weight. |
| Ecosystem / maintenance impact | 8/20 | 51 PRs and 63 commits into high-star repos like AFFiNE (★69.8k) and moeru-ai/airi (★41.3k), but the score got capped because only 4 of 9 verified sample contributions are core engineering, the rest are docs/i18n/UI window dressing. |
| Community influence | 7/8 | 469 followers is a respectable number, but it's doing a lot of heavy lifting for an account whose own projects have a combined 11 stars and a top repo that's just your personal profile page. |
| Activity authenticity | 15.7/17 | 1,629 contributions last year with no bot signals, but most of that activity is polishing other people's docs and UI, not building your own stuff. |
Red flags
- Your ecosystem impact score was capped because your verified contributions to popular repos are mostly docs/site/examples/UI changes rather than core engineering work.
- Your top-starred original repo is your own 4-star profile page (description: "Me!"), which is a personal config/profile repo, not a usable project, so its stars do not count toward a positive score adjustment.
- 77% of your recent PRs target moeru-ai/eventa.net, a 0-star repo that does not appear on your all-time impact repo list, so those contributions are not counted as verified ecosystem impact.
- Your verified impact sample has more docs/site/UI contributions (5) than core engineering contributions (4), confirming your popular-repo work is not core code-focused.
- You closed 12 external PRs yourself, a higher share of your external PR activity than ideal, though not a major red flag on its own.
Score calibration A 10-point downward adjustment was applied because the base score of 74.1 exceeded the impact quality cap of 60. Your ecosystem impact is heavily weighted toward docs/site/examples/UI work rather than core engineering, so the score was reduced to comply with the explicit cap.
Verdict This account looks solid on paper but falls apart under scrutiny: your home turf is a starless ghost town, your high-impact work is mostly window dressing, and your recent PR volume is concentrated on a 0-star repo that doesn't even count toward your impact score. A human review is needed to confirm if there's real engineering substance here or just GitHub resume theater.