🏆 Notable contributions
Popular open-source repos they've shipped to (commits + PRs)
Score breakdown
🛠 Featured work
Their own popular and pinned repositories
Infantile cerebral palsy detection system
GoCodexGo auto-approves low-risk Codex PermissionRequest hooks with local policy rules
GoPersonal profile
Intelligent scheduling system
Go🧬 Stack & domains
🧬 Most similar developers
Closest profile, nearby score
🔥 Full roast
🔥 Following 72 with only 19 followers, 14 original repos with a total of 14 stars, 10 PRs all landing in other people's high-star repos as free labor, not a single ripple from your own projects — your o
Fengzdadi — 64.70/100 · NPC (Average · Unremarkable)
TL;DR: A GitHub profile built on external gig contributions and a flashy profile repo, with a barren home turf of low-star original projects and a follower deficit that makes the open-source persona feel like cheap resume theater.
| Dimension | Score | Notes |
|---|---|---|
| Account maturity | 8.2/10 | Registered 4.45 years, contributions span 5 calendar years; steady activity, but no early GitHub legacy to lean on. |
| Original project quality | 8.4/18 | 14 original repos, total 14 stars, top starred original repo is Fengzdadi/codexgo with 4 stars and a 0.9 quality score — your home turf is so quiet you can hear the crickets. |
| Contribution quality | 15.4/27 | 13 merged PRs, 22 total PRs; 5 maintainer-closed unmerged, 1 author-closed external PR, 0 author-closed own-repo PRs, 28% rejection rate — you’re submitting a pile and bouncing a quarter of them off maintainers’ close buttons. |
| Ecosystem / maintenance impact | 15/20 | 10 PRs + 4 commits into popular repos with 20,000+ combined stars (including Apache Datasketches and MoonshotAI projects); verified sample of 4 PRs are all core, no doc-like work — you’re a temp worker for every open-source project except your own. |
| Community influence | 3/8 | 19 followers, 72 following — you follow 3.8x more accounts than follow you, chasing clout from big projects instead of building your own audience. |
| Activity authenticity | 14.7/17 | 637 contributions last year, last activity today, contributions span 5 calendar years — you’re not a bot, just a human grinding PRs for other people’s projects instead of your own. |
Red flags
- Follower deficit: 19 followers vs 72 following, a 3.8x ratio that signals you’re chasing clout from larger accounts rather than building organic community trust.
- Barren home turf: 14 original repos with a combined 14 stars, your highest-starred original project only has 4 stars — all your visible effort goes to other people’s repos, none to your own.
- 28% all-time PR rejection rate: 5 of your 22 PRs were closed unmerged by maintainers, meaning you’re regularly submitting work that doesn’t meet project standards.
- 6 all-time popular-repo contributions lack verified file-level quality samples, so we can’t confirm they are core engineering rather than docs/site/examples touch-ups.
Score calibration No extra adjustment. The base score already accounts for your verified core contributions to Apache Datasketches and MoonshotAI projects, consistent multi-year activity, and lack of obvious farming, bot, or affiliation misuse signals. No extra bump or haircut was applied.
Verdict Normal, but forgettable. Your GitHub presence is textbook open-source resume theater: flashy contributions to big-name projects, a polished profile repo, and a completely barren home turf of low-star original work. No red flags that warrant a block, but also no substance here that justifies any special trust or maintainer access.