ghfind
← Back to Hall of Fame

🏆 Notable contributions

Popular open-source repos they've shipped to (commits + PRs)

Score breakdown

🛠 Featured work

Their own popular and pinned repositories

🧬 Stack & domains

Top languages
C83%
Python11%
TypeScript5%
Meson1%
Shell0%
CSS0%
Domains
assistantchat-gptdiscordbotgpt-4gpt-4-vision-previewgpt-4ogpt-4o-minikook-botopenaislack-bot

🧬 Most similar developers

Closest profile, nearby score

⚔️ Battles

PK duels this dev has fought

🔥 Full roast

🔥 Your account is only 4.88 years old but claims 6 years of contributions? Even time travelers would call that fraud. You have a future commit dated 2026 in your own repo, plus a 494k churn PR with a gi

ElvinStarry — 73.10/100 · SOLID (Solid · Trustworthy)

TL;DR: Your star power is almost entirely borrowed from a single org-attributed project, your personal repos are a barren wasteland, and multiple timestamp anomalies plus a 494k-churn garbage PR mean you need a human review before anyone should trust your code.

DimensionScoreNotes
Account maturity8.7/10Registered ~4.9 years ago, but contribution calendar years claim 6 — a time-paradox activity span that's already a major red flag.
Original project quality16.6/18Total stars hit 1969, but 1968 of them come from the single attributed org project LlmKira/Openaibot; all your personally owned original repos are 0-1 star, with empty or placeholder READMEs and no real traction.
Contribution quality20.3/2726 merged PRs out of 39 total, with 4 maintainer-closed unmerged PRs; also includes multiple nonsensical garbled PR titles and a single PR with 494,951 lines of churn, suggesting unvetted spam or automation.
Ecosystem / maintenance impact13.4/20All-time 13 PRs + 100 commits across two popular repos, including the 129k-star clash-verge-rev and the attributed org Openaibot; verified sample of 9 PRs is all core code work for Openaibot with no doc-like impact PRs.
Community influence4/821 followers, matched 1:1 by your following count — a perfect self-simp ratio with zero real community pull.
Activity authenticity12.1/1753 contributions in the last year with activity as recent as today, but paired with future-dated commits to libfprint and a contribution span longer than your account's existence, making recent activity hard to trust.

Red flags

  • Your contribution calendar spans 6 years, but your account is only 4.88 years old — a clear time-paradox anomaly in your activity history.
  • You pushed code dated April 2026 to your personal libfprint repo, a full year in the future.
  • Multiple PRs to your own repos have nonsensical, garbled titles (e.g. "efgsdfdsfgdsfgfgz", "af ve vwegwfwgrvfw") with one hitting 494,951 lines of churn, strongly suggesting automated spam or unvetted bulk imports.
  • All your star capital is concentrated in a single org-attributed project, while all your personally owned original repos are near-empty shells with no meaningful traction.

Score calibration A 2-point reduction was applied to the base score to account for the time-paradox activity span, future-dated commits, and multiple suspicious high-churn garbage PRs. No other adjustments were made.

Verdict Requires manual human review before being considered trustworthy: the timestamp anomalies, garbage PR flooding, and barren personal project portfolio are too inconsistent to take at face value without a human check.