ghfind
← Back to Hall of Fame

🏆 Notable contributions

Popular open-source repos they've shipped to (commits + PRs)

Score breakdown

Account maturity8.5 / 10
Original project quality10.4 / 18
Contribution quality17.8 / 27
Ecosystem / maintenance impact11.6 / 20
Community influence4.4 / 8
Activity authenticity14.1 / 17

🛠 Featured work

Their own popular and pinned repositories

🧬 Stack & domains

Top languages
Jupyter Notebook87%
Python13%
Makefile0%
Batchfile0%
Shell0%
Domains
python3machine-learningcn-sentianalysistoolkitzhihuspiderchatbottensorflow2transformerchatgptchatpdfopenaicomments

🧬 Most similar developers

Closest profile, nearby score

🔥 Full roast

🔥 4.7 years on GitHub, your top original repo is a 65-star Andrew Ng course notes notebook, 6 of your 21 merged PRs are trivial avatar crops and .gitkeep padding, and all 8 of your popular-repo contribu

Duguce — 66.80/100 · NPC (Average · Unremarkable)

TL;DR: A thoroughly unremarkable GitHub NPC who pads his PR count with trivial changes and eval/docs work on big projects while his own repos are a wasteland of unstarred student course notes and tools.

DimensionScoreNotes
Account maturity8.5/10Registered 4.73 years, active across 6 contribution years, last activity 1 day ago. Nearly half a decade on the platform with no standout trajectory to show for it.
Original project quality10.4/1813 original repos, 179 total stars, max 65 stars from top repo LearningMLwithAndrewNg (a Jupyter Notebook course notes repo, quality score 0.75). Your best work is a repackaged set of Andrew Ng course assignments — your home turf is a student project showcase, not an engineering portfolio.
Contribution quality17.8/2721 merged PRs out of 25 total, 1 maintainer-closed unmerged PR, 3 author-closed external PRs, 0 author-closed own-repo PRs, 6 recent trivial PRs (avatar crops, .gitkeep, .DS_Store adds). 1 in 4 merged PRs is trivial padding, and you abandoned 3 external PRs yourself — your contribution queue is half window dressing, half forgotten drafts.
Ecosystem / maintenance impact11.6/208 PRs + 8 commits into popular repos (all-time, per impact summary), 2 impact repos: MemTensor/MemOS (10k stars, 6 PRs +7 commits) and SeekingDream/Static-to-Dynamic-LLMEval (499 stars, 2 PRs +1 commit). Verified sample of 5 PRs shows all work is eval/docs/scripts with zero core code changes — you're a window dresser for other people's code, not a maintainer or core contributor.
Community influence4.4/835 followers, 24 following. 35 followers for 4.7 years of activity, your follower count is lower than your total public repo count — you haven't influenced anyone beyond the few students copying your course notes.
Activity authenticity14.1/17383 contributions last year, 3 activity types, no bot or farming indicators. 383 contributions look busy on the graph, but dig in and half are trivial PRs and eval script tweaks — quantity over quality, the classic NPC activity signature.

Red flags

  • Several recent merged PRs are low-value padding: cropping group chat avatars for a conference repo, adding .DS_Store system files, and updating .gitkeep placeholders that change nothing functionally.
  • All 5 verified high-star (10k) ecosystem contributions are limited to evaluation scripts, documentation, and example files, with no core code changes to the target repository.

Score calibration No extra adjustment. The base score already priced in your trivial PR padding, docs-only external contributions, and student-project home turf, so no bump or haircut was needed.

Verdict Normal GitHub NPC: you show up, pad your PR count with low-value changes, and leech reputation from bigger projects while your own repos gather dust. No red flags, no real value either.