🏆 Notable contributions
Popular open-source repos they've shipped to (commits + PRs)
Score breakdown
🛠 Featured work
Their own popular and pinned repositories
🧬 Stack & domains
🧬 Most similar developers
Closest profile, nearby score
🔥 Full roast
🔥 With only 27 followers but 299 follows, 80% of your external PRs are dumped into a single 19-star gaokao-vault repo, your original projects have a combined total of 2 stars, and you can’t produce any
daguanren21 — 72.90/100 · SOLID (Solid · Trustworthy)
TL;DR: Genuine non-trivial contributions to high-star Vue and Slidev ecosystems are buried under a lopsided profile: 80% of recent PRs target one low-star external repo, 27 original repos have just 2 combined stars, and he follows 11x more people than follow him.
| Dimension | Score | Notes |
|---|---|---|
| Account maturity | 10/10 | 6.7 years on GitHub, 8 years of active contributions, last activity 0 days ago — long enough tenure to know better than to leave his own repos starless. |
| Original project quality | 6.4/18 | 27 original repos, 2 total stars, top repo is daguanren21/ai-dev-workflow with strong README depth but zero community uptake — his home turf is a barren wasteland despite the documentation effort. |
| Contribution quality | 22.3/27 | 84 merged PRs out of 93 total, 5 maintainer-closed unmerged PRs (6% rejection rate), 1 self-closed external PR, 1 self-closed own-repo PR — solid merge rate, but recent work is heavily concentrated on a single third-party repo. |
| Ecosystem / maintenance impact | 16.6/20 | 11 all-time contributions (8 PRs + 3 commits) to popular repos totaling over 100k stars (vuejs/core 53.9k, slidevjs/slidev 47.4k), no verified file-level samples for these contributions — we have to take the metadata at face value. |
| Community influence | 3.2/8 | 27 followers, 299 following — he's the MVP of the GitHub curation simp league, spending more time following other people's work than building his own audience. |
| Activity authenticity | 14.4/17 | 485 contributions last year, 3 activity types, no PR flood or trivial farming detected — the activity is real, just misallocated. |
Red flags
- All 8 all-time contributions to high-star popular repos lack file-level verification samples, so there is no confirmed proof these were substantive code contributions rather than trivial badge-farm PRs.
- 80% of recent merged PRs target the single low-star external repo
lifefloating/gaokao-vault, creating severe single-point dependency for his recent contribution profile. - 27 original repos have only 2 combined stars, with no attributed org flagship projects to offset the complete lack of community traction for his own work.
- Follow count (299) is over 11x his follower count (27), indicating heavy curation/simp behavior rather than genuine community influence.
Score calibration No extra adjustment. The base score already accounts for weak original project traction, concentrated external PR activity, and lopsided follow metrics.
Verdict Normal, low-trust contributor. His work is real and non-trivial, but it is overwhelmingly weighted toward other people's projects with almost no community proof for his own code — treat him as a reliable external contributor, not a standalone project maintainer.