ghfind
← Back to Hall of Fame
🔍 Fetching their open-source footprint (repos / languages / contributions)…

Score breakdown

Account maturity10.0 / 10
Original project quality1.5 / 18
Contribution quality21.9 / 27
Ecosystem / maintenance impact15.8 / 20
Community influence4.9 / 8
Activity authenticity14.0 / 17

🧬 Most similar developers

Closest profile, nearby score

🔥 Full roast

🔥 6-year GitHub account, 1 total star on your own projects, 116 PRs all funneled into a 79k-star repo, and a 3% rejection rate that's almost too good to be true — your open source resume is just a free

cy948 — 68.10/100 · NPC (Average · Unremarkable)

TL;DR: Average open source contributor with solid non-trivial PRs to popular third-party repos, but near-zero impact and visibility from their own original projects.

DimensionScoreNotes
Account maturity10/10Registered 6.01 years, active across 7 contribution years, last activity 0 days ago
Original project quality1.5/188 original public repos, total stars across all own projects = 1, only 1 non-empty repo with any stars
Contribution quality21.9/27107 merged PRs out of 138 total PRs; 3 maintainer-closed unmerged PRs, 9 author-closed external PRs, 10 author-closed own-repo PRs, 3% maintainer rejection rate
Ecosystem / maintenance impact15.8/20118 substantial all-time PRs/commits into popular repos (incl. 116 PRs / 97 commits to 79.2k-star lobehub/lobehub, plus 1 PR each to 61.8k-star youngyangyang04/leetcode-master and 38k-star deepseek-ai/awesome-deepseek-integration)
Community influence4.9/817 followers, following 1 user, no bio or company information listed
Activity authenticity14/17112 contributions in the last year, 4 distinct activity types, no star inflation or templated PR flood signals

Red flags: None Manual adjustment: None (0), no farming, templated PR flood, or trivial PR signals detected; score accurately reflects the account's mix of solid external contributions and negligible original project impact Verdict: Normal contributor, no action required; external contribution track record is credible, but own project portfolio offers no additional value