Score breakdown
🧬 Most similar developers
Closest profile, nearby score
🔥 Full roast
🔥 15-year GitHub veteran with 391 merged PRs and verified core contributions to cloud-hypervisor, but his own original repos top out at 44 stars — all that external horsepower, and the home garage is fu
CMGS — 80.80/100 · ELITE (Elite · Top-tier dev)
TL;DR: High-tier, low-drama contributor with a 15-year track record of shipping non-trivial code to major projects, but his own original repos are small, quiet side projects that never gathered a crowd.
| Dimension | Score | Notes |
|---|---|---|
| Account maturity | 10/10 | Registered 15.57 years, active across 17 contribution years, last activity only 39 days ago — this account has outlasted most GitHub fads and framework churn. |
| Original project quality | 10.6/18 | 31 original repos, 224 total stars, top repo 44 stars (maria, quality score 0.75), best quality repo is gua (0.9, 39 stars) — your own projects are quiet, even when the code is legit. |
| Contribution quality | 22/27 | 391 merged PRs out of 431 total, 14 maintainer-closed unmerged PRs, 16 self-closed external PRs, 4 self-closed own-repo PRs, 3% rejection rate — you don't spam PRs and get bounced, you ship real changes that get merged. |
| Ecosystem / maintenance impact | 13.6/20 | 31 PRs + 209 commits into popular repos (all-time), including 7 PRs + 10 commits to 5.8k-star cloud-hypervisor, 21 PRs + 199 commits to 241-star projecteru2/core. Verified sample of 5 PRs are all core changes (PCI/VMM/virtio), zero documentation/site/example impact PRs — you're not polishing docs on big projects, you're rebuilding the engine. |
| Community influence | 7.6/8 | 1032 followers, following only 29 — no follow-farming, just a healthy ratio of people watching your work vs. you curating other people's work. |
| Activity authenticity | 17/17 | 2211 contributions last year, active across 17 years, only 1 recent trivial PR, zero external trivial PRs, no PR flood suspect — this isn't a bot or a template farm, this is a human running on caffeine and consistency. |
Red flags None detected. No trivial PR farming, no templated PR flooding, no follow-farming, no star inflation. The only minor observation is recent PR concentration in the cocoonstack ecosystem, but all changes are non-trivial engineering work with high churn, not farming behavior.
Score calibration No extra adjustment. The base score already reflects verified core impact, low documentation/site/example contribution ratio, and legitimate original project quality, so no bump or haircut was applied.
Verdict Normal, high-tier open-source contributor. No red flags, no farming behavior, verified core engineering impact in major projects — this is what a legit, high-volume GitHub profile looks like, even if his own projects never hit the big time.