🏆 Notable contributions
Popular open-source repos they've shipped to (commits + PRs)
Score breakdown
🛠 Featured work
Their own popular and pinned repositories
🧬 Stack & domains
🧬 Most similar developers
Closest profile, nearby score
🔥 Full roast
🔥 6 years on GitHub with only 50 followers, following 74 people like a simp; your best project is a Weibo backup userscript with 473 stars, all other original repos are sub-4-star trash; you only have 1
Chilfish — 71.00/100 · SOLID (Solid · Trustworthy)
TL;DR: Long-running, low-drama contributor whose open-source résumé is 90% a 473-star Weibo backup script and self-hosted PRs, with barely any footprint in other people's popular projects.
| Dimension | Score | Notes |
|---|---|---|
| Account maturity | 10/10 | Registered 6.42 years, active across 7 contribution years, last activity 6 days ago. No ghost gaps or hibernation periods to excuse. |
| Original project quality | 10.8/18 | 20 original repos with 496 total stars; 473 of those stars are concentrated on the top-starred Weibo-archiver Tampermonkey utility (quality score 0.65), while the remaining 19 original repos have a combined 23 stars, maxing out at 4 stars per repo. The entire original project portfolio is one niche hit and 19 unused toy projects, no broader engineering substance to speak of. |
| Contribution quality | 22/27 | 82 merged PRs out of 84 total PRs, 0 maintainer-closed unmerged PRs, 2 author-closed own-repo PRs, 0 external trivial/farming PRs. Clean record with zero rejections, but half of all merged PRs target his own top-starred repo — he contributes to his own work more than anyone else's, which is fine, just not exactly broad ecosystem value. |
| Ecosystem / maintenance impact | 8.7/20 | All-time popular-repo contributions total 2 (1 merged PR + 1 commit) into the 6,985-star un-pany/v3-admin-vite repo, with no verified file-level quality sample available to confirm the changes weren't trivial UI polish or docs tweaks. Two total contributions to a big external project over 6 years is a drive-by, not meaningful ecosystem impact. |
| Community influence | 4.1/8 | 50 followers, 74 following — he follows more accounts than follow him, with no viral breakout beyond the niche user base of his Weibo backup script. |
| Activity authenticity | 15.4/17 | 1221 contributions in the last year, 3 distinct activity types (commits, PRs, issues), no templated PR flooding, no star inflation, no trivial PR farming signals. Activity is real and consistent, no bot-like patterns. |
Red flags
- All-time contributions to other people's popular repositories top out at 1 merged PR and 1 commit, with no file-level change sample available to confirm the work wasn't trivial polish on a big project.
- 50% of all merged PRs target his own top-starred Weibo-archiver repository, meaning his external contribution footprint is effectively negligible.
- No recent merged PR sample is available for review, so the quality of his most recent contribution work can't be independently verified.
Score calibration No extra adjustment. The base score already accounts for his limited external ecosystem impact and single-hit original project star distribution, with no missed qualitative signals that would justify a score change.
Verdict Normal, low-drama open-source contributor who builds useful niche tools for a small, specific user base, but has no meaningful impact on the broader open-source ecosystem. No behavior red flags, just narrow, self-focused contribution scope.