Score breakdown
🧬 Most similar developers
Closest profile, nearby score
🔥 Full roast
🔥 Your own repos top out at 38 stars, yet you landed 3 merged PRs in 51k-star whisper.cpp — your external open-source résumé is far shinier than your barren personal project graveyard
chenqianhe — 82.90/100 · ELITE (Elite · Top-tier dev)
TL;DR: A mercenary-level external contributor with solid core PRs in 51k-star repos, but his personal project portfolio is a star-starved wasteland capped at 38 stars — he’s far more impressive on other people’s turf than his own.
| Dimension | Score | Notes |
|---|---|---|
| Account maturity | 10/10 | Registered 6.85 years ago, 8 years of active contributions, last activity today — no dormancy or freshness red flags |
| Original project quality | 8.1/18 | 45 original repos with 102 total stars; top-starred repo is screenshot_and_ocr (38 stars, 0.58 quality score), a small Paddle-based OCR tool with no broad adoption |
| Contribution quality | 24.2/27 | 58 merged PRs out of 71 total; only 2 maintainer-closed unmerged PRs (3% rejection rate), 4 author-closed external PRs, 1 author-closed own-repo PR; recent merged sample has 6 trivial PRs and 16 doc-like PRs (32% doc-like ratio) |
| Ecosystem / maintenance impact | 19.5/20 | 38 substantial all-time PRs/commits into high-star repos, including 3 PRs in 51k-star whisper.cpp, 4 PRs in 17k-star omlx, 14 PRs in 7.7k-star autocut, plus core contributions to PaddlePaddle/FastDeploy |
| Community influence | 5.9/8 | 76 followers, 25 following — healthy, unremarkable ratio with no follower-farming signals |
| Activity authenticity | 15.2/17 | 1066 contributions last year, active across 3 activity types — consistent, non-bot-like activity |
Red flags
- Recent PR activity is heavily concentrated on his own 0-star personal projects (bilibili-media-ingestion and ShareBlog), which is not classified as farming but dilutes his external contribution signal.
- 15 all-time high-star impact contributions lack file-level quality sample coverage, a known data limitation that leaves some impact claims unverified but does not indicate low contribution quality.
- Two identical recent PRs were opened to his own personal repository, a minor duplicate activity signal with no farming intent.
Score calibration No extra adjustment. The base score already accounts for all verified contribution signals, original project quality, and activity authenticity, with no unmet calibration constraints requiring a bump or haircut.
Verdict Normal, high-quality open-source contributor with a proven track record of substantive work in popular external repositories. The only limiting factor is his lack of standout personal projects, which keeps him from reaching the highest tier.