← Back to Hall of Fame
🔍 Fetching their open-source footprint (repos / languages / contributions)…
Score breakdown
Account maturity10.0 / 10
Original project quality7.8 / 18
Contribution quality19.3 / 27
Ecosystem / maintenance impact12.1 / 20
Community influence4.4 / 8
Activity authenticity13.2 / 17
🧬 Most similar developers
Closest profile, nearby score
🔥 Full roast
🔥 6 years on GitHub, 34 PRs dumped into your HKUST lab compiler, your only cross-org win is a tiny pdf.js bug fix, your own projects max at 4 stars, and you're free R&D fuel for open source during your
CAG2Mark — 68.80/100 · NPC (Average · Unremarkable)
TL;DR: Solid core compiler contributor with a high-star ecosystem project PR to his name, but low traction on original projects and minimal community footprint.
| Dimension | Score | Notes |
|---|---|---|
| Account maturity | 10/10 | Registered 6.8 years, active across 8 contribution years |
| Original project quality | 7.8/18 | Total stars 34 across 46 original repos, max 4 stars per repo; top repo UstCoursePlanner (usable course planner, quality score 0.75) |
| Contribution quality | 19.3/27 | 44 merged PRs, 49 total PRs; 3 maintainer-closed unmerged PRs, 0 author-closed external PRs, 0 author-closed own-repo PRs; 0 trivial recent PRs, 0 external trivial PRs, recent external doc-like PR ratio 0% |
| Ecosystem / maintenance impact | 12.1/20 | 35 substantive core PRs/commits into popular repos: 34 PRs, 53 commits to hkust-taco/mlscript (221★); 1 PR to mozilla/pdf.js (53507★); all impact PRs are core engineering work, 0 doc-like/site/examples contributions |
| Community influence | 4.4/8 | 38 followers, 33 following, follow ratio ~1.15, no follow farming detected |
| Activity authenticity | 13.2/17 | 152 contributions in the last year, last activity 6 days ago, consistent activity over 8 contribution years |
Red flags: None Manual adjustment: +2, justified by 1 verified core PR to the 53k-star mozilla/pdf.js ecosystem project, 33 core non-trivial impact PRs to compiler projects with zero doc-like or trivial contributions, and absence of any red flags or farming behavior. Verdict: Normal, suitable for niche compiler contribution review; no blocking indicators.