🏆 Notable contributions
Popular open-source repos they've shipped to (commits + PRs)
Score breakdown
🛠 Featured work
Their own popular and pinned repositories
Cross-platform proxy rules, modules & configs—Surge-first, also for Clash / Shadowrocket / QX.
JavaScriptAttegi is an elegant and dynamic Ghost theme, with a modern design, deep support for Ghost, and specially optimized for mobile devices.
JavaScript🪞 Script & module mirror — for personal use only
JavaScriptA dynamic Open Graph image generation service with custom themes. Built on Next.js.
TypeScriptCLI and MCP server for Okta SSO authentication with persistent session management
PythonMy personal bio and portfolio website.
TypeScript🧬 Stack & domains
🧬 Most similar developers
Closest profile, nearby score
🔥 Full roast
🔥 93% of your 94 merged PRs are churn in your own 3-star site repo, while your entire all-time footprint on popular open-source projects is just 9 PRs and 13 commits across 7 repos — that GOD-tier score
bunizao — 81.50/100 · ELITE (Elite · Top-tier dev)
TL;DR: You’ve built a polished personal site and a popular niche proxy rule collection, but your external open-source footprint is so thin the original 91.5 GOD-tier score was pure self-repo KPI inflation — this is resume theater, not hall-of-fame material.
| Dimension | Score | Notes |
|---|---|---|
| Account maturity | 7.9/10 | Registered 4.24 years, active across 5 contribution years with daily activity as of today, but nearly all activity is self-directed at personal projects rather than cross-community work. |
| Original project quality | 15/18 | Total stars across original repos: 461, with 389 stars from top project TutuBetterRules, a curated proxy rule/config collection discounted to quality score 1; remaining 20 original repos have minimal traction, most sitting at 0-5 stars. |
| Contribution quality | 26.1/27 | 94 merged PRs out of 116 total PRs, with only 2 maintainer-closed unmerged PRs; 93% of recent merged PRs target your own 3-star site repo, and 0 of your 3 recent external PRs are doc-like — the high score is almost entirely driven by self-directed UI/docs churn. |
| Ecosystem / maintenance impact | 19.6/20 | All-time popular-repo contributions total 9 PRs + 13 commits across 7 distinct repos, including 57k-star tw93/Mole and 8.3k-star justlovemaki/AIClient2API; 6 of these contributions lack file-level verification, and verified samples are limited to small UI/frontend fixes rather than core engineering work. |
| Community influence | 5.9/8 | 86 followers with a normal 33 following count, no evidence of follower farming, but influence is confined to niche proxy rule and personal site circles with no broad community reach. |
| Activity authenticity | 17/17 | 2621 contributions in the last year with daily activity, but this volume is almost entirely made up of commits to your own personal site repo, measuring personal project churn rather than broad open-source engagement. |
| Red flags |
- 93% of your recent merged PRs target your own 3-star personal site repo, inflating contribution quality metrics with self-directed docs/UI churn rather than external open-source work.
- Only 3 external PRs appear in your recent 50-PR sample, with 0 being doc-like — your recent cross-project impact is almost non-existent.
- 6 of your 9 all-time popular-repo contributions lack file-level verification, so it’s unclear how much of your work on 57k-star tw93/Mole and other large projects is core engineering vs. docs/config tweaks.
- Verified popular-repo contributions are limited to small UI/frontend fixes (e.g., adding reaction display to BroadcastChannel, a 15-churn fix to TeleBox) rather than substantive core work.
- Your original 91.5 GOD-tier score wildly overstates your ecosystem impact, as your 4.24-year account age and 2621 yearly contributions are almost entirely directed at your own personal projects. Score calibration A -10 adjustment was applied to the base 91.5 score to account for extreme self-repo PR concentration that inflated the original contribution quality and doc-like metrics. No further adjustment was needed. Verdict Needs human review. You’re clearly a capable solo dev with a polished personal site and a popular niche rule collection, but your external open-source footprint is far too thin to justify a top-tier score — this profile reads like resume theater, not hall-of-fame material.