🏆 Notable contributions
Popular open-source repos they've shipped to (commits + PRs)
Score breakdown
🛠 Featured work
Their own popular and pinned repositories
🧬 Stack & domains
🧬 Most similar developers
Closest profile, nearby score
🔥 Full roast
🔥 9-year account with 1 total star on your own repos, riding 63 rizin PRs for a core-contributor badge, then padding a 40k-star project with 4.7k lines of Electron boilerplate for clout, with twice as m
bubblepipe — 72.90/100 · SOLID (Solid · Trustworthy)
TL;DR: Solid core contributor to reverse-engineering and systems tooling, but your own repo graveyard and that 4.7k-line frontend filler PR on a 40k-star repo make this feel more like a polished GitHub résumé than a standalone engineering profile. No farming signals, just a very clear focus on other people's code.
| Dimension | Score | Notes |
|---|---|---|
| Account maturity | 10/10 | Registered 8.9 years, active across 10 tracked contribution years, last activity 6 days ago |
| Original project quality | 5.2/18 | 16 original repos, 1 total star across all of them; your highest-quality original repo (ooo-bench) is a niche Nix benchmark with no stars, and your top-starred original project is a Dockerfile README with no real user base — your home turf is a ghost town. |
| Contribution quality | 20.6/27 | 60 merged PRs out of 90 total, only 5 maintainer-closed unmerged PRs (8% rejection rate); 12 author-closed external PRs, 0 self-closed own-repo PRs; recent sample has 15 trivial PRs, and only 2% of recent external PRs touch docs/site/examples — no lazy farming, just a lot of small test-binary PRs to rizin-testbins. |
| Ecosystem / maintenance impact | 19.3/20 | 115 all-time contributions (63 PRs + 52 commits) across 12 popular repos including rizin, llvm-project, and nixpkgs, with verified samples confirming core work on ELF parsing and heap analysis; 28 contributions lack file-level verification samples, which is a coverage gap, not a quality red flag. |
| Community influence | 4.1/8 | 52 followers, 89 accounts followed — you're a bigger fan of other people's code than they are of yours, zero influencer energy. |
| Activity authenticity | 13.7/17 | 258 contributions in the last year, active across a full decade, no bot-like patterns or templated PR flooding detected; your activity is genuine, just almost entirely spent on other people's repos. |
Red flags
- Heavy concentration on rizinorg/rizin, which accounts for 60% of your all-time PR share; while the contributions are substantive and span core components rather than templated bulk edits, this is a single-point dependency for your profile.
- The 4.7k-line Electron wrapper PR for QuantumNous/new-api (40k stars) is frontend/UI boilerplate-heavy; while legitimate, it is not core engineering and should not be overweighted when assessing your technical impact.
- 28 of your 115 all-time popular-repo contributions lack file-level verification samples; this is a coverage limitation, not a quality penalty, but it means we cannot fully confirm the substance of every contribution.
Score calibration No extra adjustment. The base score already reflects your substantive core contributions to popular repos, low doc-like work ratio, mature account history, and lack of farming or bot signals. The high-star frontend PR was not given a positive bump, and your barren home turf was already fully discounted in the base scoring.
Verdict Normal, low-risk contributor with a genuine track record of substantive systems engineering work. Your profile is clearly built on contributions to other people's projects rather than your own, but there are no red flags for farming, fraud, or low-quality contribution spam. Don't expect your own repos to go viral any time soon — your 1 total star home turf says it all.