Score breakdown
🧬 Most similar developers
Closest profile, nearby score
🔥 Full roast
🔥 11 years on GitHub with only 2 total PRs, 18k stars all tied to a single winlator repo, external contributions capped at 1 trivial PR to a 5k-star project and 1 tiny libcdio patch, 3k followers are cl
brunodev85 — 69.50/100 · NPC (Average · Unremarkable)
TL;DR: A one-project wonder hiding behind a single high-star repo, with almost no meaningful external contribution to speak of and a follower count that’s clearly tied to app downloads, not engineering reputation.
| Dimension | Score | Notes |
|---|---|---|
| Account maturity | 10/10 | Registered 11.3 years, active across 12 contribution years with last activity 3 days ago — this account has outlasted half the trendy frameworks developers brag about, even if it hasn’t shipped much public cross-project engineering in that time. |
| Original project quality | 17.1/18 | 12 original repos (11 non-empty) hold 18,442 total stars, nearly all tied to winlator (18,022 stars, quality score 0.95) — you’ve built a very successful single-product open source shop, but there’s no second hit to prove it’s not a fluke. |
| Contribution quality | 7.8/27 | 2 total PRs, both merged, 0 maintainer-closed unmerged PRs, 0 author-closed external PRs, 0 author-closed own-repo PRs — but one of those two PRs is explicitly marked trivial, and the other is a small patch to a 58-star library, so your public contribution resume is thinner than your winlator README. |
| Ecosystem / maintenance impact | 12.9/20 | All-time contributions to popular repos total 1 PR + 102 commits: 101 commits in your own winlator (18,022 stars) and 1 commit + 1 PR to ptitSeb/box64 (5,484 stars) — your impact is almost entirely confined to your own project, with barely any ripple into the broader open source ecosystem. |
| Community influence | 8/8 | 3,367 followers, only 2 accounts followed — your follower count is solid, but let’s be real, most of them are here for the Winlator APK, not to review your C code. |
| Activity authenticity | 13.7/17 | 258 contributions last year, 3 activity types, no bot or manipulation signals — but the contribution volume is almost entirely tied to your single winlator repo, not spread across meaningful external work. |
Red flags
- All meaningful public contribution is concentrated in a single original project (winlator), with no demonstrated impact on other popular open source projects outside of one trivial PR and one small library patch to a 58-star repository.
- The 3,367 follower count is heavily inflated by end-users of your Winlator Android app, not by peers engaging with your engineering work.
- No file-level quality samples are available for your all-time popular-repo contributions, so the substance of your cross-project work can’t be independently verified.
Score calibration No extra adjustment. The base score already accounts for your high-quality single flagship project, 11 years of active account history, lack of manipulation signals, and limited but non-farming external contributions.
Verdict Normal, unremarkable open source contributor with a single strong flagship product, but no evidence of broad cross-project engineering impact or meaningful external contribution to date.