Score breakdown
🧬 Most similar developers
Closest profile, nearby score
🔥 Full roast
🔥 8 years on GitHub, 131 PRs with zero rejections, 14k stars all from hardcore Magpie code — this isn’t open source contribution, it’s single-repo vertical monopoly
Blinue — 81.00/100 · ELITE (Elite · Top-tier dev)
TL;DR: A focused, high-output maintainer who traded cross-repo clout-chasing for a perfect 0% PR rejection rate and a 14,069-star flagship upscaler — the kind of GitHub profile that makes PR-spamming Hacktoberfest veterans look lazy.
| Dimension | Score | Notes |
|---|---|---|
| Account maturity | 10/10 | 8.52 years old, active across 10 contribution years, last activity 4 days ago — no dormant account energy here. |
| Original project quality | 14/18 | 14,120 total stars, 14,069 of them on flagship Magpie (legitimate general-purpose Windows upscaler, quality score 0.77, not a profile/curation repo), remaining small repos are mostly Magpie add-ons — home turf is strong, just narrow. |
| Contribution quality | 24.6/27 | 131 total PRs, 131 merged, 0 maintainer-closed unmerged, 0 author-closed external PRs, 0 trivial PRs in the recent 50-PR sample — perfect PR track record, no drive-by commits or rejected garbage. |
| Ecosystem / maintenance impact | 10.9/20 | 126 all-time substantial PRs/commits into the 14,069-star Magpie repo, 2,610 commits — all impact is concentrated in his own flagship, no meaningful contributions to other popular projects, which caps this dimension. |
| Community influence | 6.5/8 | 190 followers, only follows 3 accounts — low follower count for a 14k-star project, no clout-chasing follow-back schemes, just pure code energy. |
| Activity authenticity | 15/17 | 306 contributions last year, consistent recent PR activity with non-trivial churn across core C++/HLSL files — no templated PR floods, no AI-generated drive-by commits, all activity tied to actual feature/bugfix work on his project. |
Red flags No malicious or inauthentic behavior detected. The only minor observation is that all all-time popular-repo impact is concentrated in the user’s own Magpie repository, with no verified substantial contributions to other high-star projects — this is consistent with a focused maintainer, not a red flag, but limits breadth signals.
Score calibration No extra adjustment. The base score already reflects the concentrated single-repo impact and flawless PR track record, with no need for additional scoring modifications.
Verdict Normal, high-trust account. This is a legitimate, high-output project maintainer who prioritizes shipping real, non-trivial features for his widely-used upscaler over chasing cross-repo contribution badges — no manual review required unless you’re curious why his follower count is so low for a 14k-star project.