🏆 Notable contributions
Popular open-source repos they've shipped to (commits + PRs)
Score breakdown
🛠 Featured work
Their own popular and pinned repositories
AI工程化项目实战训练营的代码仓库
PythonA small quality-of-life mod that lets you pin items in your backpack.
C#本网站使用HTML和CSS(SASS)书写，供同学们交流学习使用。
CSSDify API Skills Evaluator is a local evaluation harness for testing Dify skills against real chatflow scenarios. It runs a skill through controlled test cases, traces every Dify API call, and generates logs, scores, and reports so you can compare skill quality, correctness, and efficiency.
TypeScript🧬 Stack & domains
🧬 Most similar developers
Closest profile, nearby score
🔥 Full roast
🔥 8-year account with 131 total stars, 123 trapped in a training camp repo; your own tools top out at 1 star. You drop 49 solid core contributions on Dify and Gemini CLI, then pad your PR list with CSS
Blackoutta — 80.20/100 · ELITE (Elite · Top-tier dev)
TL;DR: Ships real core code to 100k-star open-source projects, but your personal repo lineup is a 123-star training camp plus a graveyard of one-star tools, and you waste PRs on CSS fixes for random personal sites.
| Dimension | Score | Notes |
|---|---|---|
| Account maturity | 10/10 | Registered 8.27 years, active across 9 contribution years, last activity today — this account predates most modern LLM tooling. |
| Original project quality | 11.7/18 | 40 original repos, 35 non-empty, 131 total stars; 123 of those stars are locked in ai-engineer-training, a training camp course aggregate (quality score 0.8), while your highest-quality original tool, dify-skills-evaluator, only has 1 star. |
| Contribution quality | 22.7/27 | 31 merged of 38 total PRs, 0 maintainer-closed unmerged PRs, 5 author-closed external PRs, 0 author-closed own-repo PRs, 1 trivial PR in the recent sample. |
| Ecosystem / maintenance impact | 16.2/20 | 49 all-time popular-repo contributions (26 PRs + 23 commits) across 3 high-star repos including langgenius/dify (147k stars) and google-gemini/gemini-cli (105k stars); verified file samples confirm 20 core, 0 doc-like PRs. |
| Community influence | 5.1/8 | 24 followers, following 8 accounts. |
| Activity authenticity | 14.5/17 | 188 contributions last year, active across 4 activity types, 9 consecutive active contribution years. |
Red flags
- Recent PR history includes low-value patches to zero-star personal GitHub Pages repos (CSS/HTML tweaks to xianggang123/xianggang.github.io and zbqoumi/helloworld.github.io) and one explicitly trivial 2-line style fix to a beginner Python repo, which are noise that dilutes your contribution signal.
- 5 external PRs were closed by you before merging, indicating a pattern of starting contributions you don't follow through on.
- Your highest-starred original repo is a training camp course aggregate, not a standalone usable tool, so your personal project star count reflects course enrollment, not independent product adoption.
Score calibration No extra adjustment. The base score already reflects your strong core ecosystem contributions, low doc-like external PR ratio, and zero maintainer rejections.
Verdict Normal, high-trust contributor with genuine core engineering impact on major open-source projects. Your only weaknesses are a starved personal project portfolio and a habit of cluttering your PR list with low-value site patches, but there's no evidence of contribution farming or fake activity.