🏆 Notable contributions
Popular open-source repos they've shipped to (commits + PRs)
Score breakdown
🛠 Featured work
Their own popular and pinned repositories
[NeurIPS'25 Spotlight🔥]Official implementation of Uni-MuMER: Unified Multi-Task Fine-Tuning of Vision-Language Model for Handwritten Mathematical Expression Recognition
Python学术共享平台后端仓库
Go毕设论文Latex模板，fork自BUAAthesis，但是独立出来软院特供版
TeXBUAASE Big Project sophomore year Software Engineering
PythonBUAASE 大三上编译原理大作业：基于miniSysy语言的前端编译器设计
JavaREADME
🧬 Stack & domains
🧬 Most similar developers
Closest profile, nearby score
🔥 Full roast
🔥 Your original repos top out at 37 stars, your most popular project is just a paper's accompanying code, half your external work is editing issue templates for bigger projects, and you follow nearly 2.
BFlameSwift — 67.20/100 · NPC (Average · Unremarkable)
TL;DR: A textbook average open-source account: his only real standout is a NeurIPS spotlight paper repo, most external work is lightweight, and his home turf is a graveyard of student homework and template repos with almost no organic traction.
| Dimension | Score | Notes |
|---|---|---|
| Account maturity | 9.9/10 | Registered ~5.9 years, contributions span 7 calendar years, last activity 3 days ago, 226 contributions in the past year. No immaturity red flags, consistent recent activity. |
| Original project quality | 12/18 | 12 original repos pull in 80 total stars, with 37 concentrated in the NeurIPS'25 Spotlight paper implementation Uni-MuMER. The remaining repos are mostly student homework, thesis templates, and test projects with negligible star traction (max 14 stars for a 2022 academic backend). |
| Contribution quality | 12.7/27 | 4 merged PRs out of 10 total, 1 maintainer-closed unmerged PR, 1 author-closed external PR, 0 trivial PRs. 25% of recent merged PRs are docs/site-like (issue template updates), while all-time popular-repo contributions have 0 doc-like PRs, with verified samples including a core Rust auth fix and a non-core dataset script addition. |
| Ecosystem / maintenance impact | 15.1/20 | 5 PRs + 3 commits into popular repos (all-time total of 8 contributions), targeting repos with up to 26,302 stars. Verified samples include a core Rust fix for a 3,931-star tool and a dataset script for a 242-star research repo; 3 all-time contributions lack file-level samples but no penalty is applied for that coverage gap. |
| Community influence | 3.9/8 | 78 followers, 188 following (follows nearly 2.5x his follower count). Modest traction for a 6-year account with a NeurIPS spotlight repo, skewed ratio signals more repo touring than organic audience growth. |
| Activity authenticity | 13.6/17 | 226 contributions last year, active across 7 calendar years, last activity 3 days ago, no star inflation or PR flood patterns detected. Activity is consistent and genuine. |
Red flags
- Highly skewed follow/follower ratio: follows 188 accounts with only 78 followers, a clear signal that this account spends more time touring other repos than building an organic audience.
- Star-starved home turf: 12 original repos pull in just 80 total stars, with 37 of those locked in a single NeurIPS paper implementation repo; the rest are student homework, thesis templates, and test repos with almost no organic traction.
- Lightweight external contribution share: 25% of recent merged PRs are docs/site-like (issue template updates), and all-time popular-repo contributions include at least one non-core dataset script addition, with no substantive commit impact on the highest-starred external projects (e.g. only a single PR to the 26k-star
yuaotian/go-cursor-helprepo, no commits).
Score calibration No extra adjustment. The base score already accounts for the weak original project traction, lightweight external contribution share, and modest community influence, with no qualitative signals missed that would warrant a bump or haircut.
Verdict Normal, unremarkable open-source footprint: the account has genuine code contributions and consistent activity, but lacks the standout original project traction or deep ecosystem impact to move past the average tier.