ghfind
← Back to Hall of Fame

🏆 Notable contributions

Popular open-source repos they've shipped to (commits + PRs)

Score breakdown

Account maturity10.0 / 10
Original project quality16.8 / 18
Contribution quality14.4 / 27
Ecosystem / maintenance impact13.3 / 20
Community influence5.9 / 8
Activity authenticity11.3 / 17

🛠 Featured work

Their own popular and pinned repositories

🧬 Stack & domains

Top languages
TypeScript72%
JavaScript10%
Vue7%
SCSS6%
Python2%
CSS1%
Domains
nextpwawebappwebsitetranslatejavascriptpythondocxeditorexcelofficeonlyoffice

🧬 Most similar developers

Closest profile, nearby score

🔥 Full roast

🔥 8-year account with only 7 merged PRs, 86% doc-only work, your sole 2 external PRs are README tweaks on big repos, your top 1129-star office-website scores a 1/10 quality rating, plus emoji-titled PRs

baotlake — 71.70/100 · SOLID (Solid · Trustworthy)

TL;DR: Plays the open-source game for 8 years but ships mostly docs and homepage polish, with a flagship project that looks shiny on the surface but scores abysmal on actual project quality.

DimensionScoreNotes
Account maturity10/10Registered 8.64 years, active across 10 contribution years, last activity 10 days ago — you’ve had the account longer than most people have had their first job, but your PR count is lower than a junior dev’s first month.
Original project quality16.8/1817 original repos with 1756 total stars, but your top-starred baotlake/office-website scores a 1/10 quality rating — those 1129 stars are for the README marketing, not the code under the hood.
Contribution quality14.4/277 merged PRs out of 12 total, zero maintainer-closed unmerged PRs, 2 self-closed external PRs, 3 self-closed own-repo PRs, 86% of recent merged PRs are doc-like, and all 2 external PRs target docs/site assets — you’re not contributing to open source, you’re copy-editing other people’s front pages.
Ecosystem / maintenance impact13.3/20All-time 3 PRs + 31 commits into popular repos (the 38k-star deepseek-ai/awesome-deepseek-integration list repo and your own 1129-star office-website), with only 1 verified file-level sample which is the doc addition to the DeepSeek repo — your all-time “impact” is mostly commits to your own project and polishing a community resource.
Community influence5.9/884 followers, following just 1 user — your follower-to-following ratio is so lopsided you’re either a recluse or a really bad simp, either way not a community pillar.
Activity authenticity11.3/1775 contributions last year across 2 activity types, most of which are PRs and emoji-titled commits to your own repos, not real cross-community engineering work.

Red flags None detected — no maintainer rejections, no trivial PR farming, no star inflation, no suspicious PR flooding.

Score calibration No extra adjustment — the base score already reflects the low project quality of your top-starred repo, doc-heavy contribution mix, and limited external impact.

Verdict Normal, trustworthy account — you’re not faking contributions, but you’re also not moving the needle on open source. Your GitHub is a polished portfolio, not a public good.