Anonymous95.8分夯神？这贡献列表我挨个抄都抄不完
Anonymous95.8 'Hang' tier? This guy built half the OSS we all use.
AnonymousTelegram摘要bot才191星？随手扔的玩具都比我项目火
AnonymousContributed to rust and 996.ICU? My top repo has 3 stars.
Anonymous开源劳模+Rust贡献者？我连996.ICU的issue都不敢提
AnonymousTelegram summary bot 191 stars? My side project won't even run.
AnonymousJS Python Scheme全会？我只会print('Hello World')
AnonymousDify core + Rust contributor? I still can't pass C++ basics.
← Back to Hall of Fame
🏆 Notable contributions
Popular open-source repos they've shipped to (commits + PRs)
Score breakdown
Account maturity10.0 / 10
Original project quality7.3 / 18
Contribution quality27.0 / 27
Ecosystem / maintenance impact20.0 / 20
Community influence7.2 / 8
Activity authenticity17.0 / 17
🛠 Featured work
Their own popular and pinned repositories
telegram-summary-bot⭐ 191
Summarize group chat with AI, LLM && query group chat, FREE to deploy your own, support img, link meta info, reply to, auto fold result, 支持中文检索.
TypeScriptIntWithStepsOfTeXForm⭐ 44
不定积分过程生成器（By Mathematica）
Jupyter Notebookgood-books⭐ 40
some good books
cs61a-2021-summer⭐ 31
Solutions for cs61a-2021-summer
JavaScriptGGB2MMA⭐ 26
Nearly equal functions between GeoGebra and Mathematica
autosrt⭐ 25
Offline srt producer gui with whisper.cpp
Python🧬 Stack & domains
Top languages
JavaScript60%
Python38%
Jupyter Notebook1%
HTML1%
Scheme0%
CSS0%
Domains
chinesegemini-ailarge-language-modeltelegramtelegram-botcs61asicp-solutionsgeogebramanualmathematicasrtvoice-recognition
🧬 Most similar developers
Closest profile, nearby score
🔥 Full roast
🔥 9 years on GitHub with 943 merged PRs, most of which are test cleanup and session refactor grunt work for your employer dify; your top original repo is a 191-star telegram bot with a 0.22 quality scor
asukaminato0721 — 88.50/100 · ELITE (Elite · Top-tier dev)
TL;DR: Massive PR volume hides that nearly all recent work is employer chore labor at dify, and your top independent original project is a low-quality 191-star telegram bot — you’re a top-tier company engineer, not a top-tier independent open-source contributor.
| Dimension | Score | Notes |
|---|---|---|
| Account maturity | 10/10 | 9 years registered, 10 years of active contribution, 3727 contributions last year, 0 days since last activity — you never log off, do you? |
| Original project quality | 7.3/18 | 505 total stars across 86 original repos, your top-starred original project is a 191-star telegram-summary-bot with a 0.22 quality score (basically a README-wrapped template), and no original repo cracks 200 stars. |
| Contribution quality | 27/27 | 943 merged PRs out of 1514 total, 86 maintainer-closed unmerged PRs (8% rejection rate, no red flags), 14 self-closed external PRs, 0 self-closed own-repo PRs — PR hygiene is clean, no spam farming. |
| Ecosystem / maintenance impact | 20/20 | 1071 PRs + 1121 commits into popular repos across 76 projects, including 303 PRs/338 commits to dify (147k stars), plus legitimate contributions to rust-lang/rust, ggml-org/whisper.cpp, and DefinitelyTyped. Verified sample confirms work is real, just heavily weighted to employer chores. |
| Community influence | 7.2/8 | 574 followers, 259 following — solid follower count for a 9-year dev, no weird simp ratio here. |
| Activity authenticity | 17/17 | 3727 contributions last year, 3% templated PR ratio, no flood suspect — activity is 100% real, just overwhelmingly focused on your employer’s repo. |
| Red flags |
- Recent PR sample is overwhelmingly focused on chore/refactor work (session injection, type hint cleanup, test fixes) for your employer langgenius/dify, which makes your independent ecosystem impact look far smaller than the raw PR count implies.
- Your top-starred original project (telegram-summary-bot, 191 stars) has a very low quality score (0.22), meaning it’s a low-effort template/README project rather than a meaningful independent build — your original project portfolio doesn’t back up your PR volume.
- Nearly a third of your all-time popular-repo contributions (641 of 2192 total PRs + commits) are concentrated in a single employer repo (dify), so your public open-source impact is heavily tied to your day job rather than independent cross-ecosystem contribution. Score calibration No extra adjustment. The base score already prices in the fact that nearly all recent contribution is employer chore work and your top original project is a low-quality 191-star telegram bot. Verdict Normal, high-volume company contributor with clean PR hygiene and legitimate work, but your independent open-source portfolio is too weak to match your PR count — you’re a top-tier employee, not a top-tier independent open-source maintainer.