Score breakdown
🧬 Most similar developers
Closest profile, nearby score
🔥 Full roast
🔥 14-year GitHub account with only 39 total stars, your most popular original repo has just 28 stars, 74 of your 83 repos are forks, only 4 contributions last year, and 30% of your recent PRs are trivia
ainopara — 73.40/100 · SOLID (Solid · Trustworthy)
TL;DR: 14-year GitHub account with legitimate all-time core contributions to top Swift projects, but a barren home repo lineup, near-zero recent activity, and a recent PR slate dominated by low-value docs tweaks to a single 31-star repo.
| Dimension | Score | Notes |
|---|---|---|
| Account maturity | 10/10 | 14 years registered, 15 years active; recent activity has collapsed to just 4 contributions last year, with the last commit 14 days ago |
| Original project quality | 10/18 | 9 original repos, 39 total stars, top repo Stage1st-Reader has 28 stars and a 0.89 quality score — the only original project with any real traction, all others are tiny tools or abandoned side projects |
| Contribution quality | 23.1/27 | 64 merged PRs out of 73 total, 2% maintainer rejection rate; 30% of recent merged PRs are trivial, and nearly a third of external PRs orbit docs/site/examples work rather than core engineering |
| Ecosystem / maintenance impact | 19/20 | All-time 10 PRs + 11 commits across 7 popular repos (total ~39k stars), including core work on airbnb/lottie-ios, getsentry/sentry-cocoa, and spotify/XCRemoteCache; verified sample shows 19 core PRs to just 1 doc-like PR |
| Community influence | 4/8 | 41 followers, 53 following — you follow more people than follow you, a clear sign this is a consumer profile, not a community hub |
| Activity authenticity | 7.3/17 | Only 4 contributions last year, 1 activity type tracked, last activity 14 days ago — the account is barely ticking over, with almost no recent signal to verify ongoing engagement |
Red flags
- Near-dormant recent activity: only 4 contributions in the last year, with the last activity 14 days ago — a 14-year-old account with 73 total PRs should be more active than this.
- Elevated trivial PR ratio: 30% of recent merged PRs (15 out of 50) are trivial, low-value changes like typo fixes and podspec tweaks.
- Skewed recent PR focus: a large chunk of recent external PRs are docs/site/examples updates for the low-star WildDogTeam/wilddog-doc2 repo, rather than core engineering work — it looks like you’re padding your PR count with easy wins on small projects.
Score calibration No extra adjustment. The base score already priced in the low recent activity, elevated trivial PR ratio, and docs-heavy recent PR slate, so no additional bump or haircut was applied.
Verdict Normal, but barely. The account has legitimate all-time core contributions to high-star Swift projects, but the barren home turf, near-dormant recent activity, and habit of padding PRs with low-value docs tweaks keep it from being a standout, high-trust profile.