🏆 Notable contributions
Popular open-source repos they've shipped to (commits + PRs)
Score breakdown
🛠 Featured work
Their own popular and pinned repositories
A collection of shellcode, ripped straight from the shell-storm database. We host this just for easy access, since shell-storm cannot be reached within the Academy's Internet.
CCTF writeup for learning
Jupyter NotebookTeamwork
JavaScriptVarious cryptosystems and number theory algorithms
Java🧬 Stack & domains
🧬 Most similar developers
Closest profile, nearby score
🔥 Full roast
🔥 Ten-year account, 88 forks, 7 of 11 PRs trivial, zero core engineering on high-star repos, top project is a curated shellcode mirror, ghost repos pushed from 2026 — this is GitHub persona packaging, n
7feilee — 62.50/100 · NPC (Average · Unremarkable)
TL;DR: Long on GitHub presence, short on engineering substance — a decade of fork bookkeeping, trivial-PR farming, and a curated shellcode archive as the flagship, with suspicious future-dated commits that need verification before this profile passes as credible technical evidence.
| Dimension | Score | Notes |
|---|---|---|
| Account maturity | 10/10 | registered 10.19 yrs, contributions span 11 calendar years |
| Original project quality | 10.3/18 | 82 stars across 37 original repos, max 42 on shellcode (a curated mirror from shell-storm); no attributed org flagship |
| Contribution quality | 16.1/27 | 11 merged PRs, 13 total; 0 maintainer-closed unmerged, 0 author-closed external, 0 author-closed own-repo; 7/11 recent merged are trivial |
| Ecosystem / maintenance impact | 10.6/20 | 2 PRs + 1 commit into ★19,672 and ★1,159 repos (all-time); verified sample: 1 doc-like PR (CTF writeup), 0 core |
| Community influence | 4.7/8 | followers 132, following 218 |
| Activity authenticity | 12.8/17 | last-year contributions 105 |
Red flags
- Future-dated commits: multiple own repos (7feilee.github.io, media-power-atlas, ai-industrial-explosion, capital-atlas) show push timestamps in 2026, years ahead of account creation — possible automation, backdating, or data integrity issues that need verification.
- Zero core engineering substance: all-time popular-repo contributions contain 0 core impact PRs and 1 doc-like impact PR (a CTF writeup); the verified sample confirms docs/writeup work rather than code or design.
- Trivial-PR dominance: 7 of 11 recent merged PRs (63.6%) are trivial — CTF team registrations, image uploads, one-line endianness flips — low substance despite a clean acceptance rate.
- Fork-heavy portfolio: 88 forks against 37 original repos (70% fork share), with only 82 total stars across all original projects and the top repo being a curated shellcode mirror rather than original engineering.
Score calibration No extra adjustment was applied because the base score already reflects the contribution profile. The -2 point haircut accounts for the underweighted core-engineering gap, trivial-PR dominance, and future-dated repo timestamps that the initial pass missed.
Verdict Needs human review — a ten-year account with a fork-heavy portfolio, zero core engineering credentials on popular repos, trivial-PR dominance, and suspicious future-dated commits that must be verified before this profile is treated as credible engineering evidence.