🏆 Notable contributions
Popular open-source repos they've shipped to (commits + PRs)
Score breakdown
🛠 Featured work
Their own popular and pinned repositories
A simple tool that generates (and translates) transcripts for your favourite podcast eps, powered by GitHub Actions
PythonYet Another GUI for lux (former annie)
GoBlazing slow C minifier using Clang Lexer & Parser magic
C++lightweight static site generator (SSG) powered by Pandoc
HaskellCredits:engstk;ederekun;lyq1996......Force-pushing
C🧬 Stack & domains
🧬 Most similar developers
Closest profile, nearby score
🔥 Full roast
🔥 7 years on GitHub with only 15 total stars, 63 followers but 261 follows, 2 of your 8 merged PRs are duplicate commits to your own repo, your open-source presence is just padding your resume with edge
135e2 — 61.50/100 · NPC (Average · Unremarkable)
TL;DR: A 7-year GitHub account with the star output of a weekend side project, whose entire open-source footprint is a mix of dusty forks, low-star personal repos, and a handful of PRs to big-name projects that read like resume padding. Perfect for a GitHub profile that looks busy but crumbles under 2 seconds of scrutiny.
| Dimension | Score | Notes |
|---|---|---|
| Account maturity | 10/10 | Registered 7 years, active across 8 contribution years, last activity only 70 days ago – you’ve had more than enough time to build something people care about, and you didn’t. |
| Original project quality | 7.7/18 | 21 original repos, only 15 total stars across all of them, top-starred original repo (transcriber) only has 8 stars, best quality score 0.85 for a kernel port that’s just a dumped upstream with force-push history – your own turf is a wasteland, no one cares about your personal projects. |
| Contribution quality | 14.7/27 | 8 merged PRs out of 15 total, only 1 maintainer-closed unmerged PR, 3 self-closed PRs to your own repo, 1 self-closed external PR – your PR hit rate is fine, but nearly a third of your closed PRs are you abandoning your own half-baked work, and your external contributions are all polishing windows on other people's houses. |
| Ecosystem / maintenance impact | 12.4/20 | 3 PRs + 3 commits into popular repos totaling 18,414 stars (binwalk 14k, BlackArch 3.4k, xmake-repo 918) – all-time impact is 6 touches on high-star projects, but that’s the entire sum of your meaningful external work in 7 years, the rest is fork hoarding and self-serve PRs. |
| Community influence | 3.7/8 | 63 followers, 261 following – you follow 4x more people than follow you, your "influence" is just you simp-ing for other people's repos. |
| Activity authenticity | 13/17 | 126 contributions last year across 3 activity types, no PR flood or trivial farming detected, but 70 days since last activity and most of your recent PRs are either to your own repo or trivial one-line updates to big projects – your activity graph looks green, but the substance is mostly water. |
Red flags
- 70 days since last public activity: your account is currently on life support, not exactly the vibe of a dedicated open-source contributor.
- 1 maintainer-closed unmerged external PR: you’ve earned at least one hard bounce from a project maintainer, a small but telling blemish on your contribution record.
- 3 self-closed PRs to your own repositories: you have a habit of kicking off personal projects and abandoning them halfway, leaving a trail of half-baked self-serve work in your wake.
Score calibration No extra adjustment. The base score already captures your mix of long account tenure, minimal personal project traction, and a small handful of high-star external contributions that don’t make up for the 63 forks and 15 total stars on your own work.
Verdict Normal, but aggressively unremarkable. You’re not a malicious actor, a PR farmer, or a bot – you’re just a 7-year GitHub user who’s left no meaningful mark, the kind of account that’s lost in the 261 repos you follow for cheap inspiration.